Body scan 3D (Styku)

3D imaging to visualize posture, track body shape changes, and monitor progress over time

Body scan 3D (Styku)

Table of contents

Basic data

The 3D body scan by Styku offers a fast, non-invasive way to capture your full body shape, posture, and circumferential measurements. Using infrared imaging and a rotating platform, it creates a 360° digital avatar — allowing users to track body changes in fat distribution, waist-to-hip ratio, and shape over time.

While not as precise as DXA or Tanita for body composition, it adds a unique visual dimension. It helps enhance accountability and motivation, offering clear visualizations of transformation that go beyond the scale.

Category: Body composition

Level: Intermediate

Usefulness: Medium

Level

Intermediate

This scan is categorized as Intermediate because it becomes particularly useful once basic metrics (like weight, BF%) are already being tracked, and the user wants more visual or regional analysis. It doesn’t replace other diagnostics but complements them by highlighting changes in shape, symmetry, and posture.

It’s a great tool for those entering recomposition, aesthetics, or fitness-focused phases of their journey. However, it may offer limited value for beginners who aren’t yet tracking the fundamentals of training, nutrition, and metabolic health.

Usefulness

Medium

The 3D scan offers powerful visualization and motivation — especially when combined with other diagnostics. While it’s not a clinical-grade measurement, its value lies in visual feedback and body shape tracking.
Visualizes changes in body shape over time

The digital 3D avatar enables you to clearly see where fat is lost or muscle gained — especially across waist, hips, thighs, and chest.

Tracks circumferential measurements

Automatically captures key circumference metrics (waist, hip, thigh, biceps, chest) and compares them over time. Useful for recomposition tracking.

Enhances motivation and adherence

Seeing real-time changes in your 3D model can reinforce habit changes — even when the scale doesn’t move.

How it works

Styku uses infrared depth sensors and a rotating turntable to scan the full body in under 40 seconds. The system reconstructs a 3D avatar and extracts body metrics based on geometric analysis.
Infrared depth sensors scan body surface

A single stationary infrared sensor captures thousands of depth points as the user slowly rotates on the platform.

3D avatar is reconstructed from scans

The software generates a high-resolution digital model that reflects body contours and symmetry.

Metrics are derived from geometry

Circumference and ratio data are calculated from precise virtual landmarks on the 3D body model.

Measures

The Styku 3D body scan focuses on body shape, measurements, and visual symmetry — offering both raw data and graphical comparisons over time.
Circumferential measurements

Waist, hips, thighs, chest, arms, and more. Useful for fitness and aesthetics tracking.

Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)

A valuable marker of fat distribution and cardiometabolic risk — now with precise visual context.

Body volume and surface area

Overall body volume estimates and shape mapping. Useful in visualizing physical transformation.

3D posture analysis

Postural alignment and asymmetries can be tracked over time (optional in some setups).

Reliability

While less precise than imaging methods like DXA, or high-end clinical-grade BIA devices, Styku offers good consistency when conditions are controlled. Its primary strength is visualization, not clinical-grade measurement.
Repeatable when done under similar conditions

Circumference tracking is consistent when clothing, posture, and body positioning are standardized.

Best for trend visualization

Great for showing before/after shape and size — less useful for detecting small day-to-day shifts.

Limitations

This tool has important limitations compared to DXA or BIA. It excels in motivation and shape tracking, but is not a substitute for clinical diagnostics.
Doesn’t directly measure fat or muscle mass

All data are derived from surface geometry — no tissue composition is assessed.

Sensitive to clothing and posture

Results can be affected by baggy clothes or inconsistent body position.

Interpretation is more aesthetic than clinical

Best used as a supplemental tool rather than a primary diagnostic.

Frequency

During recomposition or aesthetics-focused phases

Every 4–8 weeks to visualize body changes and stay motivated. Avoid over-frequent scans — subtle visual changes may take time to emerge.

General tracking

Every 3–6 months for general posture or symmetry monitoring.

Cost

Wellness centers or body clinics

Typically $25–50 per scan, depending on location and whether consultation is included.

Included in coaching programs

Many gyms or personal training packages include 3D scans as part of progress tracking.

Availability

Available at select gyms, clinics, and body centers

Styku scanners are most often found in high-end fitness centers, body transformation clinics, or health optimization hubs.

Not typically available for home use

Due to hardware requirements, this scan is usually performed on-site in professional settings.

Preparation

Wear tight-fitting or minimal clothing

Form-fitting athletic wear helps ensure accurate geometry and consistency between scans.

Stand tall and still during scan

Proper posture is key for symmetry tracking. Stay centered and follow technician instructions.

Interpretation

The 3D scan provides a highly visual, easy-to-interpret output — but may lack clinical depth. Focus on progress and visual feedback rather than isolated numbers.
Compare avatars over time

The most motivating use case — see clear visual differences month to month.

Use circumference trends as secondary data

Waist, hip, and thigh changes should align with goals (e.g., fat loss, hypertrophy).

Track posture and symmetry for balance

Some setups highlight lean asymmetries or postural shifts. Use as visual feedback, not diagnosis.

Alternatives

Tanita BIA or InBody

Offer internal tissue data and precise BF%/muscle metrics, but no visual modeling.

DXA scan

Most accurate for fat and lean mass — includes regional fat data, bone density, but lacks visual avatars.

FAQ

Does the 3D scan show body fat %?

Not directly. Some systems estimate BF% using circumferential formulas, but this is less accurate than BIA or DXA.

How often should I repeat the scan?

Every 1–3 months during active progress phases. Less frequent use is fine for general visual tracking.

Can I use this scan at home?

No — the hardware is not portable or consumer-focused. It requires a Styku setup at a gym or clinic.

Is this useful for muscle gain tracking?

Yes — while it doesn’t measure muscle mass directly, it shows regional growth visually through circumference and shape changes.